Agenda and minutes

Venue: Council Chamber, Council Offices, Cecil Street, Margate, Kent

Contact: Emily Kennedy - (01843) 577046 

Items
No. Item

164.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

Apologies were received from Councillor Dawson and Councillor Howes for whom Councillor D Saunders and Councillor Dennis were present.

 

165.

Declarations of Interest

'To receive any declarations of interest.  Members are advised to consider the advice contained within the Declaration of Interest Form attached at the back of this Agenda.  If a Member declares an interest, they should complete that form and hand it to the Officer clerking the meeting and then take the prescribed course of action.'

 

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

166.

Minutes of Previous Meeting pdf icon PDF 217 KB

To approve the Minutes of the Planning Committee meeting held on 15 March 2017, copy attached.

Minutes:

It was proposed by Councillor Jaye-Jones, seconded by Councillor Tomlinson and agreed that the minutes of the Planning Committee held on 15 March 2017 be approved and signed by the Chairman.

 

167.

OL/TH/15/0187 – Flambeau Europlast Ltd, Manston Road, Ramsgate pdf icon PDF 47 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Planning Applications Manager outlined the report.

 

It was proposed by the Chairman and seconded by Councillor K Gregory:

 

“That the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘Option 4.1 - Members confirm that planning permission be deferred to officers for approval subject to securing a legal agreement for the provision of contributions to the SAMM and affordable housing as set out in the report and conditions outlined at Appendix A.’”

 

Following debate, the motion was out to the vote and declared CARRIED.

 

168.

Schedule of Planning Applications pdf icon PDF 105 KB

To consider the report of the Director of Community Services, copy attached for Members of the Committee.

 

Note: Copies of correspondence relating to applications received will be available for members’ perusal in the Members’ Room from 5.00pm on the Friday before the meeting until the date of the meeting.

169.

A01 - F/TH/16/1579 - Disused Railway Line Between Nash Court Gardens And Nash Road, Margate pdf icon PDF 129 KB

Minutes:

PROPOSAL: Erection of 7no. single storey dwellings with associated access road.

 

Speaking in favour of the application was Mr Brown.

 

It was proposed by the Chairman and seconded by the Vice-Chairman:

 

“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘That the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

1  The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

 

GROUND:

In accordance with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Purchase Act 2004).

 

2  The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted drawings numbered:

16122-01-D (received 18/01/17)

16122-02-C (received 18/01/17)

16122-03-B

16122-04-A

16122-05-D (received 02/02/17)

16122-07-A (received 22/03/17)

16122-08-A (received 22/03/17)

11903/A1/01 Revision D (received 23/01/17)

11903/A1/02 Revision A (received 23/01/17)

 

GROUND:

To secure the proper development of the area.

 

3  No development shall take place on any external surface of the development hereby permitted until details of the type, colour and texture of all materials to be used for the external surfaces of the buildings have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

 

 

GROUND:

To ensure a satisfactory external appearance and grouping of materials in accordance with the principles of the NPPF.

 

4  Before the first occupation of plot 7 hereby permitted the kitchen window within the rear elevation shall not be less than 1.7 metres above the floor of the room in which it is installed. The window shall be permanently retained in that condition thereafter.

 

GROUND:

To protect the residential amenities of the occupiers of nearby property.

 

5  Notwithstanding the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes B and C of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), the enlargement of the dwelling house consisting of an addition or alteration to its roof shall not be allowed without the granting of specific planning permission.

 

GROUND:

In order that the Local Planning Authority may retain control of development which might be detrimental to the amenities of the locality if otherwise allowed by the above mentioned Order.

 

6  Prior to first occupation of any part of the development hereby permitted, a plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority indicating the positions, heights, design, materials and type of boundary treatment to be erected. The boundary treatment shall be completed before the occupation hereby permitted is commenced or before the buildings are occupied or in accordance with a timetable to be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

 

GROUND:

To ensure that the development is compatible with the amenities of the locality in accordance with the NPPF.

 

7  Prior to the commencement of development hereby approved,  full details of both hard  ...  view the full minutes text for item 169.

170.

A02 - FH/TH/17/0119 - 139 Sea Road, Westgate-On-Sea pdf icon PDF 41 KB

Minutes:

 

PROPOSAL: Erection of first floor side extension;  part two storey/part single storey rear extension; enlargement of balcony area to the east of the front elevation, together with erection of balcony to the west of the front elevation, and alterations to front fenestration

 

Speaking in favour of the application was Mr Linnane.

 

Speaking raising points of concern was Mr Matthews.

 

Speaking under council procedure 20.1 was Councillor Ashbee.

 

It was proposed by the Chairman and seconded by Councillor J Fairbrass:

 

“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘That the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

1  The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

 

GROUND:

In accordance with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Purchase Act 2004).

 

2  The proposed development shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted application as amended by the revised drawings numbered 2015.06 J received 27 February 2017 and 2015.06 K received 01 March 2017.

 

GROUND:

To secure the proper development of the area.

 

3  The development hereby approved will be finished in render and red tiles to match the existing property, together with light grey cedral cladding, white UPVC windows and doors and glazed balustrading as annoted on the approved plans numbered 2015.06 K received 01 March 2017.

 

GROUND:

In the interests of visual amenity in accordance with Policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan.’”

 

Following debate, the motion was put to the vote and declared CARRIED.

 

171.

A03 - F/TH/16/1714 - Cascades Casino, Zion Place, Margate pdf icon PDF 29 KB

Minutes:

PROPOSAL: Erection of 1.9m wrought iron fence and gate

 

Speaking in favour of the application was Mr Minter.

 

Speaking raising points of concern was Mr Chapman.

 

Speaking as ward councillor was Councillor Johnston.

 

It was proposed by the Chairman and seconded by Councillor J Fairbrass:

 

“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘That the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

1  The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

 

GROUND:

In accordance with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Purchase Act 2004).

 

2  The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted drawings numbered

5598-402 and received 20 December 2016.

 

GROUND:

To secure the proper development of the area.’”

 

Following debate, the motion was put to the vote and declared CARRIED.

 

172.

A04 - F/TH/17/0029 - Land Adjacent Apple Garth, Green Road, Birchington pdf icon PDF 44 KB

Minutes:

PROPOSAL: Erection of a single storey two bedroom dwelling and single garage.

 

It was proposed by Councillor K Gregory, seconded by Councillor Tomlinson and RESOLVED:

 

“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘That the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

 

1  The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

 

GROUND:

In accordance with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Purchase Act 2004).

 

2  The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted drawings numbered CT7001 received 16 January 2017, CT7002, CT7003 entitled 'Drainage Layout' CT7003 entitled 'Elevations - Garage' received 08 January 2017.

 

GROUND:

To secure the proper development of the area.

 

3  Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved samples of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby approved shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved samples.

 

GROUND:

In the interests of visual amenity in accordance with Policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan 

 

4  Prior to the first occupation of  the development hereby approved,  full details of both hard and soft landscape works, to include:

 

o  species, size and location of new trees, shrubs, hedges and grassed areas to be planted

o  the treatment proposed for all hard surfaced areas beyond the limits of the highway

o  walls, fences, other means of enclosure proposed

 

shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority.

 

GROUND:

In the interests of the visual amenities of the area and to adequately integrate the development into the environment in accordance with Policies D1 and D2 of the Thanet Local Plan.’”

 

173.

R05 - OL/TH/17/0195 - Land Adjacent 12 To 14 Fort Road, Margate pdf icon PDF 50 KB

Minutes:

PROPOSAL: Outline application with some matters reserved for the erection of 3No. two storey dwellings, including access, layout and scale

 

It was proposed by Councillor K Gregory, seconded by Councillor Tomlinson and RESOLVED:

 

“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘That the application be REFUSED for the following reasons:

 

1  The proposed development, would lead to the loss of an important gap within the Conservation Area. The loss of this gap would fail to preserve the established pattern and rhythm of development within the street scene and would represent a development that appears cramped and congested. The proposal fails to demonstrate that the development would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area, resulting in significant harm to the character and appearance of Margate Conservation Area not outweighed by the public benefits of the development, contrary to Policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan, and paragraphs 132 and 134 of the National Planning Policy.

 

2  The proposal, by virtue of obscuring the only window to a habitable room in the side elevation of the adjacent property would result in unacceptable living standards for the future occupiers of that property.  The proposal is, therefore, contrary to Thanet Local Plan Policy D1 and paragraph 17 of the National Planning Policy Framework.’”

 

174.

R06 - F/TH/16/1756 - Rear of 44 Canterbury Road, Margate pdf icon PDF 56 KB

Minutes:

PROPOSAL: Erection of 3No. dwellings with associated parking and landscaping

 

Speaking in favour of the application was Mrs Gregson.

 

Speaking as ward councillor was Councillor Ashbee.

 

It was proposed by the Chairman and seconded by Councillor J Fairbrass:

 

“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘That the application be REFUSED for the following reasons:

 

1  The proposed development will result in an isolated form of backland development, appearing cramped, congested and unrelated to the pattern of surrounding development, significantly detrimental to the character and appearance of the area, contrary to Policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan and paragraphs 58 and 64 of the NPPF.

 

2  The proposed dwellings by virtue of their proximity to and relationship with the residential properties within the Royal Seabathing development and approved development to the west of the development yet to be built, will result in an unacceptable degree of mutual overlooking, for both neighbouring and future occupiers of the development, contrary to Policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan.

 

3  The proposed dwellings by virtue of their location, height and relationship with and proximity to the adjacent existing residential properties within the Royal Seabathing development will result in an unacceptable loss of outlook to the detriment of neighbouring living conditions, contrary to Policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan.’”

 

Following debate, the motion was put to the vote and declared LOST.

 

Then, it was proposed by Councillor K Gregory and seconded by Councillor Tomlinson:

 

“That Members approve the application subject to safeguarding conditions, as it will not have a significantly harmful impact on the character and appearance of the area or neighbouring living conditions:

 

1  The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three

years from the date of this permission.

 

  GROUND:

  In accordance with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as 

  amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Purchase Act 2004).

 

2  The development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted drawings numbered

  3991-PD-02 Rev B, 3991-PD-03 Rev A Received on 23 Dec 2016, 3991-PD-04, 3991-PD-06 as amended Received on 27 January 2017

 

  GROUND:

  To secure the proper development of the area.

 

3  The first and second floor windows in the East Side Elevation of the development; hereby approved shall be provided and maintained with obscure glass.

 

  GROUND:

  To safeguard the privacy and amenities currently enjoyed by the occupiers of adjoining residential properties in accordance with policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan.

 

4  All new windows shall be timber and set within 100mm reveals

 

  GROUND:

  In the interests of visual amenity in accordance with Policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan

   

 

5  All hard and soft landscape works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. The works shall be carried out prior to the first occupation of any part of the development, or in accordance with a programme of works to be agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Any trees or plants which within  ...  view the full minutes text for item 174.

175.

R07 - OL/TH/16/0724 - 15A Tothill Street, Minster, Ramsgate pdf icon PDF 76 KB

Minutes:

This item was withdrawn.

 

176.

R08 - F/TH/16/1271 - Former St Mary Magdalene Church, Woodchurch Road, Birchington pdf icon PDF 60 KB

Minutes:

PROPOSAL: Erection of 2No. two storey dwellings with access and parking

 

Speaking in favour of the application is Mr Gradus.

 

It was proposed by the Chairman and seconded by Vice Chairman:

 

“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘That the application be REFUSED for the follow reason:

 

1  The proposed development would result in new homes in the countryside and have a detrimental impact upon the character of the rural area as a result; it is not considered that there is any special justification why countryside protection should be relaxed, under paragraphs 17 and 55 of the NPPF. The proposal is therefore contrary to the NPPF and there are no material considerations that suggest it is appropriate. In this instance permitting development would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of providing two dwellings.’”

 

Following debate, the motion was put to the vote and declared CARRIED.

 

177.

R09 - F/TH/17/0139 - Land Rear Of 10 Cornford Road, Birchington pdf icon PDF 50 KB

Minutes:

PROPOSAL: Erection of a detached 2-storey dwelling

 

Speaking as ward councillor was Councillor Brimm.

 

It was proposed by the Chairman and seconded by the Vice-Chairman:

 

“THAT the officer’s recommendation be adopted, namely:

 

‘That the application be REFUSED for the follow reason:

 

1  The dwelling, by virtue of the small plot size and 2m high close boarded fence to the front amenity space, would result in a cramped and over intensive development with the fence as a detrimental and incongruous feature which fails to respect the surrounding pattern of development and the character and appearance of the area, to the detriment of the visual amenities of the locality, contrary to saved policy D1 of the Thanet Local Plan  D1 and paragraphs 17, 56 and 64 of the National Planning Policy Framework.’”

 

Upon being put to the vote, the motion was declared CARRIED.