Agenda and draft minutes
Venue: Pugin & Rossetti Rooms, First Floor, Council Offices, Cecil Street, Margate. View directions
Contact: Anona Somasundaram
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies for Absence An apology for absence has been received from Councillor Hayton, who will be substituted by Councillor K Gregory Minutes: An apology for absence was received from Councillor Hayton, for whom Councillor K Gregory was present as substitute. |
|||||||||||||||
Minutes of Previous Meeting PDF 60 KB To approve the Minutes of the Constitutional Review Working Party meeting held on 7 March 2013, copy attached. Minutes: On the proposal of Councillor Nicholson, seconded by Councillor Watkins, the minutes of the meeting of the Constitutional Working Party held on 7 March 2013 were approved and signed by the Chairman. |
|||||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest To receive any declarations of interest. Members are advised to consider the advice contained within the Declaration of Interest form attached at the back of this agenda. If a Member declares an interest, they should complete that form and hand it to the officer clerking the meeting and then take the prescribed course of action. Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|||||||||||||||
Request to speak under Council Procedure Rule 24.1 Councillor Driver requested to speak under Council Procedure Rule 24.1 on the following agenda items:
The request, upon being put to the vote, was refused.
Councillor Driver thereupon left the meeting. |
|||||||||||||||
Contract Standing Orders and Purchasing Guide PDF 82 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Working Party was of the view that the following amendments should be made to the recommendations as set out at paragraph 6.1 of the officer’s report:
i. the words, “minor amendments”, being changed to “non-material amendments”; and
ii. the words, “provided that a report on the amendments be brought to the next available meeting of the Constitutional Review Working Party”, being added to the final recommendation
It was proposed by Councillor K Gregory, seconded by Councillor Wright and AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee:
“THAT the amendments to the Contract Standing Orders and Purchasing Guide as shown at Annexes 1 and 2 be approved, such amendments relating to the following areas:
a) reinforcement of conflict of interest and confidentiality undertaking protocols including addition of “conflict of interest” contract clause as standard for contracts valued £10,000 and over;
b) inclusion of obligations and requirements of the Council in respect of Public Services (Social Value) Act 2013;
c) realignment of headings of Standard Contract Clauses to the Council’s General Conditions of Contract;
d) Non-materialamendments to job titles and section headings to align with the current Council structure / establishment;
e) authorisation to the Strategic Procurement Manager to undertake such non-materialamendments as a result of restructures, as required from time to time, without the requirement to revert to the Constitutional Review Working Party, provided that a report on amendments be brought to the next available meeting of the Constitutional Review Working Party. |
|||||||||||||||
Revision to Financial Procedure Rules re reporting of balance sheet debt PDF 65 KB Minutes: Concern was expressed that, under the proposed arrangements, as set out at paragraph 2.4 of the report, a debtor with payment terms of 90 days might pay off part of the debt at, say day 85, in order to bring it just below the £150,000 threshold level and thereby avoid the requirement to report to Council.
The Working Party was of the view that debts of over £150,000 as at day 60 or day 90 (whatever the case may be) should be reported to Council regardless of whether the debt had been paid in part or in full in the period between day 60 or day 90 and the next available ordinary Council meeting. It was recognised that the Council would be interested in the recovery plan that had put in place in relation to the debt.
It was proposed by Councillor Nicholson, seconded by Councillor K Gregory and AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee:
|
|||||||||||||||
Review of Protocol for the Guidance of Planning Committee Members and Officers PDF 68 KB . Additional documents:
Minutes: It was proposed by Councillor K Gregory, seconded by Councillor Watkins and AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee:
THAT the Standards Committee be requested to recommend to full Council approval of the revised Planning Protocol at Annex 1 to the officer’s report. |
|||||||||||||||
Filming of Council meetings PDF 99 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: On the proposal of Councillor Watkins, seconded by Councillor Nicholson, it was AGREED TO RECOMMEND to the Standards Committee:
|
|||||||||||||||
Review of decisions made in private session PDF 100 KB Minutes: The Working Party felt that not only should there be a review one year after an exempt decision was taken, but that a further review should take place three years later where the outcome of the first review was that the information should remain exempt.
The Working Party also felt that a report on decisions reviewed should be brought to full council on an annual basis, such report to include reasons wherever it is considered not possible to release the report/information to the public.
It was proposed by Councillor Nicholson, seconded by Councillor K Gregory and AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee:
1. THAT a confidential / exempt report is reviewed a year after the ultimate decision-taking body has considered it;
2. THAT if, after the first year review, a report is still treated as exempt, that report should then be the subject of a further similar review on the third anniversary of the decision having been first reviewed;
3. THAT the reviews of the status of exempt information relate to all decisions other than those taken by the Standards Committee or its sub-committees;
4. THAT only exempt decisions taken after the constitution has been updated are affected by this process – in other words, it is not retrospective;
5. THAT the list of officer delegations in the constitution be amended to include a delegation to the Corporate and Regulatory Services Manager to conduct the reviews of exempt information and determine whether it should be published;
6. THAT the Corporate and Regulatory Services Manager publishes his decision on review, giving reasons for such decision;
7. THAT Democratic Services uses the modern.gov system to publish reports that are no longer deemed to be exempt.
8. THAT full Council receives a report on the decisions reviewed by the Corporate and Regulatory Services Manager on an annual basis; such report to include the reasons wherever it is considered not possible to release the report/information to the public. |
|||||||||||||||
Substitute Members of the Governance & Audit Committee PDF 72 KB Additional documents: Minutes: It was proposed by Councillor Watkins, seconded by Councillor Nicholson and AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee:
|
|||||||||||||||
To review Constitutional Procedure Rule relating to "Putting the Motion to the Meeting" PDF 79 KB Minutes: It was proposed by Councillor Watkins, seconded by Councillor K Gregory, and AGREED TO RECOMMEND that CPR 16.3 be amended as follows:
“16.3 Putting the Motion at the Meeting
The Member whose name appears first on the Notice will move the motion during his or her speech and call for a seconder. If seconded and the mover of the motion is a member of a political group other than the ruling political group, the Chairman will call upon a member of the ruling political group to reply. If seconded and the mover of the motion is a member of the ruling political group, the Chairman will call upon a member of one of the other political groups to reply. In such circumstances the Chairman will call upon a member of the second largest political group unless, exceptionally and based upon the nature of the motion, the Chairman considers it appropriate to call upon a member of another political group (other than a member of the ruling political group) to reply. The motion shall then stand referred without further discussion to the Cabinet or appropriate Committee for determination or report unless the Council decides to debate the motion in accordance with Rule 19.” |
|||||||||||||||
Review of Members' Code of Conduct PDF 57 KB Minutes: The report was NOTED. |
|||||||||||||||
Report to follow Minutes: It was AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee that the following constitutional amendments be approved:
Para 8.0 Citizens' Rights – Summary and Explanation Para 3.01(d) – Complaints – Article 3 – Citizens and the Council.
“unless a breach of the Code of Conduct for Members ins involved in which case the Chief Executive shall report the matter to the Standards Board for England”.
“the work of the Standard's Board for England in respect of the Code of Conduct”
and
“(iv) To attend the Kent and Medway Independent Standards Committee”
It was NOTED that amendments to Paragraph 3.2 – Registration and Declarations of Interests – Protocol for the Guidance of Planning Committee Members and Officers - were being considered under agenda item 6 - “Review of Protocol for the Guidance of Planning Committee Members and Officers” (minute no. 6 refers). |
|||||||||||||||
Changing the Petitions Scheme to a Protocol PDF 65 KB Minutes: It was AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee:
THAT paragraphs 12.0 to 12.9 of the Council Procedure Rules be moved to Part 5 of the Council's constitution and that the following new paragraph 12.0 be added:
“12.0 Petitions from the Public
The Council will receive, accept and deal with petitions from members of the public in accordance with the requirements of any Petitions (singular in report rec) Scheme from time to time adopted by the Council. The Council’s current Petitions Scheme is included in Part 5 of the Council's constitution.”
It was NOTED that the Overview and Scrutiny Panel had, at its meeting on 20 August agreed:
“to refer the issue of the re-wording the Constitution in relation to debating of petitions at Council to the Constitutional Review Working Party”
and that a report on this matter would be brought to the next meeting of the Working Party. |
|||||||||||||||
Leader's Report - Review of Council Procedure Rule 2.2 PDF 73 KB Minutes: It was proposed by Councillor Nicholson, seconded by Councillor Watkins and AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee:
THAT the following wording be removed from Council Procedure Rule 2.2:
“The total time (including time slots as mentioned above) will be limited to 31 minutes”.
|
|||||||||||||||
To Review Council Procedure Rule 3.1 - Calling Extraordinary Meetings PDF 76 KB Minutes: The Working Party was of the view that increasing the number of Members required to sign a requisition to one-eighth of the total membership of Council would not compromise the ability of a relatively small number of Members to call an extraordinary meeting.
It was proposed by Councillor Watkins, seconded by Councillor Nicholson and AGREED TO RECOMMEND to Standards Committee:
THAT Council Procedure Rule 3.1 be amended to read:
|