Agenda and draft minutes

External Grant Funding Review Working Party - Monday, 13th May, 2024 5.30 pm

Venue: Online Only

No. Item


Apologies for absence


Apologies were received from Councillor Manners.


Declaration of Interests pdf icon PDF 87 KB

  • View the background to item 2.

To receive any declarations of interest. Members are advised to consider the advice contained within the Declaration of Interest advice attached to this Agenda. If a Member declares an interest, they should complete the Declaration of Interest Form


There were no declarations made at the meeting.


External Grant Funding Review Working Party Work Programme pdf icon PDF 80 KB


Councillor Austin, Chair of the working party, introduced the subject for discussion and said that she had expected the review would focus on what the Council could do to increase external funding coming into Thanet, particularly in the form of small grants to support local voluntary organisations. The perception amongst Councillors was that there could be missed opportunities for these organisations to access external funding for their activities. The review would not be focusing on business or on large scale funding.


Members of the working party made comments as follows:


·  In carrying out its review assignment the working party would need to engage a number of voluntary organisations in the district and infrastructure bodies that could include Kent Coast Volunteering, Funding for All and Stronger Kent Communities;

·  It was also necessary to compare the ways other local councils work to support voluntary organisations to identify best practice;

·  The working party should also engage parish and town councils to find out how TDC could best work with parishes to support small voluntary organisations;

·  The working party would also need to gather evidence from TDC officers and find out about their role in grant funding sourcing and information sharing;

·  One Councillor said that finding out about the customer experience was important, as this would inform the Council if there was a need to review and reform the protocol for working with community groups

·  Funding applications processes were a barrier for a number of small community organisations;

·  It was also important to find out about the organisations’ aims and objectives - but it was worth noting that community organisations are constantly evolving;

·  Having a portal for community groups could potentially be a helpful way to engage groups and help them become more connected, but this could have cost implications;

·  Another Councillor commented that core funding was an issue for voluntary groups that should be pursued in this review;

·  There were individuals within the community who possessed skills required for assisting organisations through the fund applications process, so the Council could potentially tap into such human resource;

·  In trying to reach out to voluntary organisations, the working party could send out a survey questionnaire in case some of the organisations were unable to attend the working party meetings to give evidence;

·  The working party would like to access the list of voluntary organisations held by the Regeneration Team in order to identify which ones to engage in discussion, though they might wish to speak with organisations not on the list too;

·  Spaces Connect in Margate might be a good organisation to engage. Councillor Pope was going to provide contact details for this organisation;

·  Social value should be included in these discussions;

·  The working party might also want to consider non-financial support like volunteer days or help with business management skills.


In response, Louise Askew made the following points:


·  The working party might benefit from talking to Penny Button and her team on community development;

·  The Regeneration team had done some survey and mapping and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.