Councillor Paul Moore, Chair of the Planning
Enforcement Working party introduced the item and gave a feedback
report to the Panel. The Panel was asked to either adopt the
recommendations in the working party report or adopt an alternative
approach to the review.
Members made comments and asked questions as
follows:
- The recommendations were a good
idea;
- The council could second a planning
officer to increase the numbers on the planning enforcement
team;
- What was the timeline for finalising
the recommendations?
- Were there any opportunities using
enforcement activities for making savings or generating
income?
- How would the council create
incentives for developers to comply with palling policies in the
first place without creating the need for retrospective planning
applications?
- Could some of the enforcement work
be subcontracted?
- How was the monitoring of
development conditions that included planting of trees and creating
play areas in new development, particularly with new large
development coming up?
- Could the council set its own local
fees for planning enforcement?
- How long should it take before the
Section 106 fund is used?
- If the S106 fund was identified for
particular sites, how could councillors monitor the use of this
fund?
- Although the department was working
with a small enforcement team, they were doing a great job;
- On the Planning Enforcement Portal,
there were a number of long-standing planning applications that
included the caravan park and a burger bar. These two have
generated a number of emails to councillors from residents. How
would the department inform the public about progress regarding
these applications?
Iain Livingstone, Planning Applications
Manager responded as follows:
- The OSP recommendations would add
more information to the ongoing review;
- The review would also be looking at
additional resources that be made available to the department;
- The option of apprentices would be
considered;
- The review would be for a six months
period and was expected to be concluded by year end;
- The new Protocol would be
recommended to Full Council for adoption;
- Officer could bring back a summary
of the review outcome to the Panel meeting later in the year, (23
November 2021);
- The Planning Enforcement team could
use the criminal act to raise generate income, but that income
would be shared with the government;
- In order to adequately monitor
development work, there would be a need for additional resources
mainly the legal resources;
- There were no punitive measures for
retrospective planning applications;
- Retrospective planning was permitted
within the current national planning legislation;
- The department has often approached
estate agents to provide change of use advice to assist with
minimising the number of retrospective planning applications;
- There was a need to agree on an
approach for inter departmental working to enhance the work of
planning enforcement;
- Adherence to living conditions and
the environment were key priority areas for planning
enforcement;
- Compliance with conditions had
generated the most complaints;
- The setting of fees was done at the
national level;
- Use of S106 was dependent on the
agreement in place. However most such agreements had a 5 year
period within with to use the funds;
- Open Spaces team would be involved
and the council would usually go to tender and within two years the
works would be completed;
- Councillor would need to check with
the Planning Applications Manager regarding the monitoring of S106
funds;
- Planning applications were published
in such a way that the public would log in and check if there
already was a complaint about the application;
- With regards to retrospective
planning, often the department would keep enforcement in abeyance
until the retrospective planning had been submitted.
After the debate Councillor Paul Moore
proposed, Councillor Fellows seconded and Members agreed that the
Panel approve the following recommendations from the Planning
Enforcement Review Working Party and further agreed to forward them
for consideration to Cabinet as part of the ongoing review of the
Council’s planning enforcement protocol. These are that:
a.
Investigations be carried out to determine the potential utility of
a planning enforcement portal on the council’s website to
provide updates to members of the public and elected members on
current cases, as well as increasing the availability of
information about the Enforcement process for the public;
b.
A review be conducted to identify how the council could come up
with a more effective system of prioritising planning enforcement
cases;
c.
A review be conducted to determine how best to improve
communication between the council and complainants regarding
planning enforcement cases being handled by the council;
d.
Investigations be carried out to determine how best the council
could include proactive work in the planning enforcement
protocol.