Sally O’Sullivan, Tenant and Leaseholder
Services Manager introduced the report and made the following
comments:
- Service standards were a set of
commitments to council residents. They provided information about
the level of service they could expect from the council. These
standards also provided guidance to officers to the level of
service they should be providing;
- Residents were involved in the
development of these standards to varying degrees;
- Repairs service standard - This
standard described the service that was delivered by the
council’s partnering contractors, Mears and Gas Call. It also
provided information to Council tenants about what to expect from
the repairs service, that included on the following issue:
- The different ways in which they can
report a repair;
- How long different categories of
repairs will take to be carried out;
- How an appointment will be
made;
- What to expect from a contractor
when they come to their home;
- How we monitor the service.
- Much of this standard was dictated
by the contracts the council had in place. However, Council had
consulted the Thanet Tenant & Leaseholder Group (TTLG) on the
Mears customer pledge. This document set out standards of behaviour
for the operatives and call centre staff and as a result of the
feedback from the TTLG, further training was put in place for the
call centre staff;
- The Lettings standard informed
residents on what they could expect when they move into one of the
council homes. The standard provided them with information on what
would happen when they sign a tenancy agreement, what information
they would receive and what standard to expect their new home to be
in when they move in;
- To inform this standard, officers
surveyed all new tenants from the previous six months. The purpose
of this exercise was to learn from residents’ experience and
find out what was important to them when moving in;
- A message that came through this
survey was the concern about the quality of the information given
to new tenants and this feedback prompted the development of a new
resident handbook.
Members made comments as follows:
- Members fully supported the new
proposals as contained in the officer report;
- Tenants Groups were a useful
platform for creating wider consultation with residents on any new
changes;
- Some residents had been asked by the
council to remove wall gardens in communal areas in tower blocks
without prior explanation;
- This had caused some distress to
residents;
- It was important that on
implementation of any new policies that resident’s
involvement and consent was considered.
Sally O’Sullivan and Bob Porter,
Corporate Director of Place responded to comments from Members as
follows:
- It was unfortunate that residents
were asked to remove their wall gardens from communal areas;
- However this had been done as a
result of the feedback from the Fire Risk Assessors;
- A fire risk assessment was carried
out and required that the wall gardens be removed from communal
areas in tower blocks;
- The fire risk assessment came up
with a position of zero tolerance wall gardens in communal
areas;
- Officers had provided information
through newsletters and TOT Notices explaining the fire risk
assessment requirements to remove wall gardens;
- The council had also a telephone
number that residents could call for an explanation;
- Officers were aware of storage
shortage in tower blocks and were proposing new purpose built
storage.
Members noted the report.