Agenda and minutes

Overview & Scrutiny Panel - Tuesday, 24th May, 2016 7.00 pm

Venue: Council Chamber, Council Offices, Cecil Street, Margate, Kent. View directions

Contact: Charles Hungwe 

Items
No. Item

56.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

Apologies were received from the following Members:

 

Councillor Dennis;

Councillor Bambridge, substituted by Councillor Mave Saunders.

57.

Declarations of Interest

To receive any declarations of interest. Members are advised to consider the advice contained within the Declaration of Interest form attached at the back of this agenda. If a Member declares an interest, they should complete that form and hand it to the officer clerking the meeting and then take the prescribed course of action.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest received at the meeting.

58.

Minutes of Previous Meeting pdf icon PDF 72 KB

To approve the Minutes of the Overview and Scrutiny Panel meeting held on 26 April 2016, copy attached.

Minutes:

Councillor Campbell proposed, Councillor Jay-Jones seconded and Members agreed the minutes to be a correct record of the meeting held on 26 April 2016.

59.

Establish the Overview & Scrutiny Panel Work Programme for 2016/17 pdf icon PDF 163 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor D. Saunders, Chairman of the Overview & Scrutiny Panel introduced the report and led the discussion. He requested Members consider each of the key recommendations for establishing the Panel’s work programme for 2016/17. One Member suggested that the Panel continued with the previous approach that involved all the political group representatives on the scrutiny working party activities.

 

Councillor Campbell proposed, Councillor Parsons seconded and Members agreed to unanimously disregard political proportionality in setting up the sub committees and further agreed a membership size of eight for each of the sub groups whose composition would be as follows:

 

3 UKIP;

2 Conservative;

1 Labour;

1 Democratic Independent Group;

1 Independent Group.

 

Members agreed that the Panel should reconstitute the three sub groups from the previous year’s work programme as each of them had important role to play in reviewing the council and joint arrangements’ performance. The Community Safety Working Party would continue to review the implementation of the community safety plan.

 

The Corporate Performance Review Working Party would monitor the council’s corporate performance and budget and take a lead in scrutinising the budget proposals for the forthcoming year. The working party would also review the performance of joint arrangements that Thanet District Council is a part of. The Electoral Registration Process Review Working Party would continue to monitor and suggest ways for improving voter registration in the district. Members further suggested that the Panel could continue to keep a watching brief on the activities of the QEQM Hospital Cabinet Advisory Group and the Margate Museum.

 

One Member raised some concerns about the pending closure of some surgeries in the district, including the one in Garlinge. They suggested that TDC took up the issue and express these concerns on behalf of the affected residents. In response Madeline Homer, CEx said that the issue had been raised directly with Thanet Clinical Commissioning Group (Thanet CCG) and that this issue will be on the Thanet Health & Wellbeing Board. She suggested that Members could raise these issues with the Leader in the hope that Councillor Wells will write to the Thanet CCG to share the Council’s view on the matter.

 

Councillor Campbell proposed, Councillor D. Saunders seconded and Members agreed the following:

 

1.  To re-constitute the following sub groups:

 

a)  Community Safety Working Party;

b)  Corporate Performance Review Working Party;

c)  Electoral Registration Process Review Working Party;

 

2.  The draft terms of reference;

 

3.  That before any consideration of substantive business, the sub groups would review their respective terms of reference at their first meeting and report back any suggested changes to these terms to the next available Overview & Scrutiny Panel for approval;

 

4.  That before any consideration of substantive business, all sub groups would complete the project template at their first meeting and report back the details to the next available Overview & Scrutiny Panel for approval.

 

The Chairman asked each of the political groups to provide names of their respective representatives to sit on the three sub groups to Democratic Services outside the meeting.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 59.