Agenda and minutes

Extraordinary, Overview & Scrutiny Panel - Tuesday, 28th April, 2015 7.15 pm

Venue: Council Chamber, Council Offices, Cecil Street, Margate, Kent. View directions

Contact: Charles Hungwe 

Items
No. Item

461.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

Apologies were received from the following Members:

 

Councillor Gibson;

Councillor Gideon, substituted by Councillor Bayford;

Councillor I. Gregory, substituted by Councillor Binks;

Councillor Hornus, substituted by Councillor M. Saunders;

Councillor Worrow, substituted by Councillor Edwards.

462.

Declarations of Interest

To receive any declarations of interest. Members are advised to consider the advice contained within the Declaration of Interest form attached at the back of this agenda. If a Member declares an interest, they should complete that form and hand it to the officer clerking the meeting and then take the prescribed course of action.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest.

463.

Overview & Scrutiny Panel Call-In of a Cabinet Decision - Transfer of Fort Road Hotel from the General Fund to the Housing Revenue Account pdf icon PDF 137 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Councillor Campbell, as the Chairman of the meeting invited Councillor Wells to speak under Council Procedure Rule 24.1, as per the Member’s request. Councillor Wells said that when expressions of interests were invited by the Council two potential developers expressed their interest, but later withdrew when the freehold tenancy that was associated with the Fort Road Hotel was withdrawn. He said that the proposed development of social housing units would be one of the most expensive forms of social housing to be constructed as ‘it was rumoured that between three to six units’ would cost about £950,000. He urged the Panel to refer the decision back to Cabinet.

 

Madeline Homer, CEx gave a brief back ground to the issue. She said that the subject on the Fort Road Hotel had been to Cabinet on five occasions and a report with options was presented to Members at each of those Cabinet meetings. Market testing was undertaken after permission was obtained from Cabinet and an iconic sign was installed on the building. Madeline Homer said that one of the drawbacks regarding that property being attractive to prospective developers was the lack of amenities on the land on which the property was situated.

 

One solution proposed was to acquire the adjacent land. Other options that included setting up a preservation trust were mooted. However this did not materialise. Although some negotiations were entered into with one potential developer, those negotiations were terminated when the developer could not provide evidence that they could finance the development of the property. Since no further expressions of interest were lodged with the Council, officers presented a report to Cabinet on 2 April 2015 seeking a decision on how to progress this issue.

 

The Chairman then invited Panel Members to debate the call-in. One member expressed concern about the lack of additional background information to the issue. However they were advised that such back ground information was the publicly available reports that had been considered on previous occasions by Cabinet. Madeline Homer confirmed that the Council did not withdraw the freehold that is associated with the property.

 

Other Members were concerned that the issue had been determined by Cabinet without the usual cross-party consultation and wider Member contribution that could have also involved going through a scrutiny process. They suggested that the Panel could set up a task and finish group to consider the evidence on how the Council conducted the market testing for the Fort Road Hotel and the results of that test.

 

Councillor Bayford proposed and Councillor K. Gregory seconded that Cabinet reconsiders its decision made on 2 April 2015.

 

Speaking under Council Procedure Rule 24.1, Councillor Johnston, Leader of Council said that the issue had gone on for too long and needed resolution. She said that a number of previous Cabinet Administrations had failed to resolve the issue.

 

The Chairman requested Members to decide on the proposal put forward by Councillor Bayford and seconded by Councillor K. Gregory, ‘that Cabinet reconsiders its decision made on  ...  view the full minutes text for item 463.